For college teachers, self-built housing controversy, the parties to sort out the council reporter found that the industry controversial “one-third to one-half the” purchase price difference, in fact, within the framework of the policy to allow.

In the “SCS [1998] No. 230″ and “teach the [1998] 23 Man”, are to encourage scientific research institutes, universities, cultural organizations and health agencies to use units of occupied land to build affordable housing for workers .

However, Tsinghua University, the construction of teachers’ collective property “, not the same as in the general sense of Beijing’s affordable housing. After 5 years in Fang Ling, teachers may not be able to obtain independent property titles, can not be traded freely. It is understood that many universities had set up the residential buildings are collective property of the swing. Apart from a number of community “self-built housing welfare” controversy, the university housing system should establish what exactly? On July 29, 2010 Xinhua News Agency authorized to issue “national long-term reform and development plan (2010-2020)” in section 54 that “according to the law to ensure that not less than the average teacher salary level or higher than the national the average civil service wage levels, formulate preferential policies to improve teacher working and living conditions. “

Cheng CPPCC right that college teachers housing problem must be solved, or difficult to retain talent. He suggested that “the government should confidently enjoy the same treatment as they were, the proportion of supplies set aside two rooms.” Young teachers in the first set of owner-occupied housing, the policy should be allowed to apply for down payment assistance, mortgage interest subsidies given to the government.

However, the College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Tsinghua University Professor Qin Hui also pointed out that China’s current welfare policy is very easy to mess “being rich”, the name of the weak tend to be under the banner of welfare to the privileged create opportunities. So how to avoid the standard of the teachers have to go home have no room to allocate much-needed housing young teachers, but also the preferential policies for future research to consider when.

China’s GDP growth rate of 9.6% during the first half

Restart the welfare housing?

Department of Housing and the “New Building NO.7″

Woman cut husband to pieces

Civil service housing “new channel”

Civil service housing distress

Shenzhen: welfare housing stopped after eight years

Housing reform, “no return way”

Civil service housing “New Deal”

University housing allocation storm

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.